This kinda answers DOM's question on how to put the previous post into practice.
Sashkin and Huddle give slightly more concrete measures that principals can take.
======================
Reflections
–
The
Principals Leadership Role in Creating Effective Schools (Sashkin & Huddle)
Rossert (1985) asserts that one of the
characteristics common to effective schools is “a school principal who is a strong programmatic leader and who sets
school goals, maintains student discipline, frequently observes classrooms and
creates incentives for learning.”
Bossert (1985) identifies two
commonalities among effective principals.
The first is organisational visibility. This is similar to the practice of
“management by walking around as described by Peters and Waterman (In Search of
Excellence, 1980).
The second consists of using information and insights to make
clear decisions and take specific actions linked to the creation of an
effective learning environment, and getting others to understand the need to
take such action and its link with the learning environment.
In sum, “effective leadership helps a school’s staff articulate shared values,
goals and approaches to school improvement.”
Corcoran (1985) also agreed that principals play critical roles in
articulating school ideology.
Firestone and Wilson (1985) identify
two ways in which principals create effective schools.
First, principals must be good
bureaucratic administrators, creating
and manipulating rules, procedures and authority relationships.
Second, they must create “cultural
linkages” by establishing norms,
symbols, rituals and stories, and by serving as role models.
Most effective principals act with
respect to both bureaucratic and
cultural linkage.
Bureaucratic
Linkage
They act with bureaucratic linkage by
prioritising their time according to what
is most important and putting first those activities over which they have the greatest control. (Austin,
1979)
Less effective principals tend to
often act according to the demand of others.
More effective principals address
their own priorities, not just responding to those of their district superiors.
They do this in the following three ways:
-
By
being more selective in how they use their personal time.
-
By
going beyond district minimum requirements in areas important to them.
-
By
influencing their own superiors to provide commitment and support needed for
the principal to take action.
Cultural
Linkage
They act with Cultural Linkage in the
following three ways:
-
By
“managing” the creation and spread of stories of real incidents that focus on,
illustrate and support major organisational values.
-
By
creating symbols and rituals (awards for achievement, staff award ceremonies,
etc) that reinforce people’s beliefs about the positive consequences of
behaviours in-line with organisational values.
-
By
constantly and consistently, through their own interpersonal behaviours, voice
and display norms of behaviour that are in tune with organisational values and
beliefs.
Critical
Functions of an Organisation
Parsons (1960) argued for four
critical functions that any organisation must do to survive:
-
Adapt
to Change in the Environment.
-
Attain
Goals as desired by Client or
Customer
-
Integrating
and Coordinating the Actions of People
in the Organisation
The Most Basic of these Four defines
and determines how the other three are addressed.
-
Articulating
and Maintaining a Pattern of Actions through
the development of a set of common values, beliefs and norms of behaviour.
As an organisational leader, the
principal defines, constructs and indicates shared values, beliefs and norms
with respect to these three areas of Change,
Goals and People. He then needs to
gain the commitment of organisation members to these cultural factors.
Creating
Culture through:
Stories -> Values -> Innovation (Positive Attitude to Change)
Symbols & Rituals -> Beliefs -> Rewarding and Recognising
(Acknowledging Goals)
Principal’s Behaviour -> Norms -> Treating People Right (Coordinating People)
What do
Principals do to Create Effective School Cultures?
The effective leader creates a vision,
a concept of what the organisation can be, and makes that vision real by
constructing an organisational culture to support the vision.
The vision will be consistent with broader district level (or
national level) goals, but is more
specific, applying broader goals to the specific school context and often going beyond them to create a new and
somewhat unique vision of what the school should be.
Three ways
to Translate Vision into Action
1) Develop a Clear and Brief Statement of the Vision.
(Organisational Philosophy)
Statement must be
clear enough for everyone to express and created with the active involvement of
key personnel.
The Organisational
Philosophy identifies clearly the values that are the basis of the
organisational culture.
2) Create Practices that Live Up to the Principles that have
been Defined.
These can be in the
form of programs or policies and requires a commitment of time and resources.
The principal acts as participant, catalyst and chief decision maker.
These practices
create clear cause-and-effect linkages, strengthening staff belief about the
consequences of goal attainment.
3) Practice Specific Leadership Behaviours by Principals.
Sashkin (1986)
identified 5 such behaviours for leaders to focus people’s attention on key
points and issues.
o
Communicate
well and with effective listening skills
o
Display
a consistency in behaviour that leads people to trust them (even if they do not
agree with them) because they do not change their minds easily
o
Constantly
display and express respect for self and others on a personal level
o
Identify
sensible risks for all to take ownership of so as to ensure success
o
Develop
a variety of reinforcement and reward systems to encourage others to take
risks. (Immediate and tangible rewards for starters but must be followed by
intrinsic rewards to institutionalise new approaches.)
it seems that for principals to be effective leaders, they need to have both vison and the resources to action it. i have no doubt that SG has individuals with such capabilities. i wonder where and how do politics fix into the picture? MOE (and the Minister of Ed) is still the employer of school principals afterall.
ReplyDeleteOur school leaders get a lot of autonomy... Which can work both ways I guess. We better be really sure of our leadership selection...
ReplyDelete